What Bitcoin Did

View Original

Why Small Blocks are Important for Bitcoin with Samson Mow

Peter McCormack
See this content in the original post

Where to find the show

iTunes | Google | Spotify | Stitcher | SoundCloud | YouTube | Deezer | TuneIn | RSS Feed

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

Why Small Blocks are Important for Bitcoin with Samson Mow - WBD017 Peter McCormack

Download Episode MP3 File
The file will open in new window. Click down arrow to download the file.

Interview location: New York
Interview date: Sun 13th May 2018

The scaling question is undoubtedly one of the most exciting and contentious debates in Crypto. Two sides fiercely divided on what Bitcoin is, who it is for,  how it should scale and there appears to be little middle ground between the camps:

  • Big blockers claim that Core and Blockstream have taken Bitcoin hostage

  • Small blockers claim that Bitcoin Cash is a false Bitcoin and is stealing the brand

Having met with Roger Ver, I wanted to discuss this with someone from the small block side, and Samson Mow, Chief Strategy Officer at Blockstream, agreed to meet me before the Consensus conference in New York.

One topic I avoided discussing was the collusion between Core and Blockstream, firstly, from what I can see, any accusation is circumstantial, and secondly, Samson has already answered this, and I suspect, would answer it the same.

What I wanted to do was understand the incentives for Blockstream and look further into the role of Lightning Network in the scaling of Bitcoin. I think it is difficult to deny that for Bitcoin to scale to support millions of users globally, second layer technologies are required, even Roger ver agrees, but at what cost?

What I struggle with is the relationship between Lightning Network and the main chain. I struggle with the fee market on the main chain and how users around the world might one day be priced out of using it, and thus, not available to have the opportunity to core Bitcoin features such as cold storage. I don't like tiered security features based on wealth, especially as we are always advised to protect our private keys with our lives.

Maybe this will be solved in the future, and maybe this is the way the free market must work. I don't have the answer but is something Samson, and I discuss in detail, and you will be able to hear my frustrations with this.

Small blocks undoubtedly suit Blockstream's business model but are they building a business on top of the right scaling solution or are they pushing a scaling solution which suits their interest. I don't buy the conspiracy but understand why bitter big blockers are suspicious.

See this content in the original post

SUPPORT THE SHOW

If you enjoy The What Bitcoin Did Podcast you can help support the show my doing the following:

If you are interested in sponsoring the show, you can read more about that here or please feel free to drop me an email to discuss options.

SHOW NOTES

BREAKDOWN OF THE SHOW

00:05:09: Introductions
00:06:36: Blockstream
00:07:21: Blockstream Satellite
00:10:32: What is Bitcoin to Samson?
00:15:02: Bitcoin is for everybody
00:15:16: Establishing a circular economy
00:18:40: Scaling issues
00:20:44: Consensus rules explained
00:24:22: Bitcoin Cash - scam or fork?
00:28:16: Censorship on Reddit
00:34:19: Bitcoin adoption by merchants
00:45:37: Lightning Network
00:50:27: Lightning channels and the UX
00:56:23: Implications of mainchain fees
01:06:33: Trade-offs for decentralisation
01:08:16: Bitcoin vs Bitcoin Cash for the developing world
01:20:02: Final comments

THANKS

See this content in the original post